Grading Standards Explained
Understand the four pillars of Pokémon card grading and see how PSA, CGC, and PokeGrade compare.
Core Pillars of Condition
PokeGrade evaluates cards using four universally recognized attributes. Clear definitions help collectors self-assess and predict outcomes before sending to a grading service.
Centering
Measures artwork alignment within borders. Front and back are assessed separately; common tolerances use ratios (e.g., 55/45, 60/40).
Edges
Condition of the four sides. Whitening, chipping, or fraying from handling can reduce the grade.
Surface
Print layer, gloss, and texture. Watch for scratches (especially on holo), print lines, stains, or dents.
Corners
Sharpness and integrity of corner tips. Softness, whitening, or folds cause deductions.
1) Centering
Definition: Evenness of the image within borders.
- How it's judged: Front/back measured separately; ratio tolerances like 55/45 or 60/40 are typical references.
- Impact: Near 50/50 is ideal; severe off-centering or miscuts can significantly reduce the final grade.
2) Edges
Definition: Cleanliness and wear along the perimeter.
- Common flaws: Whitening, chipping, fraying, small dents.
- Impact: Minor whitening may be a small deduction; heavy chipping or dents are major defects.
3) Surface
Definition: Visual and physical condition of front and back surfaces.
- Common flaws: Holo scratches, print lines, roller marks, stains, impressions.
- Impact: Light print lines can be compatible with mid–high grades; deep scratches, stains, or dents cause larger downgrades.
4) Corners
Definition: Sharpness and shape of the four tips.
- Common flaws: Soft/rounded tips, whitening, folds or crushed corners.
- Impact: Razor-sharp corners are ideal; soft or damaged corners lead to noticeable deductions.
Note: Some services publish explicit tolerance charts and subgrade weights. Regardless of methodology, these pillars remain the basis of collectible card evaluation.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | PSA | CGC | PokeGrade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Longstanding trading card grading; broad market recognition | Technical grading across comics & TCG; detail-oriented | Pokémon-specific analysis with clarity and education |
| Subgrades | No subgrades | Optional subgrades | Per-attribute breakdown |
| Scale | 1–10 (Gem Mint 10) | 1–10 (includes 9.5, 10 Pristine) | 1–10 (Pokémon-optimized logic) |
| Method Emphasis | Holistic visual assessment | Technical precision & documentation | Transparent analysis + learning tools |
| Use Case | High market liquidity & prestige | Granular condition insight | Pre-grading education & prediction |
Final Takeaway
Centering, Edges, Surface, and Corners form the shared language of grading. By making these criteria explicit and easy to understand, PokeGrade helps collectors evaluate cards confidently and set realistic expectations for third-party grading outcomes.
This page is for educational guidance. For official grading outcomes, refer to the respective companies' published standards and policies.